New hampshire lottery anonymous. Mega Millions Lottery Winner Anonymously Picks Up $108.5M Check

Looking for:

New hampshire lottery anonymous
Click here to ENTER

Feb 13,  · — A New Hampshire woman who won a $ million Powerball jackpot should be able to collect the winnings soon while a judge decides whether to let her remain . Feb 08,  · “People are really going to want to know who she is.” There are seven states that allow lottery winners to remain anonymous. An additional six states, including New . Sep 29,  · There are 11 states that allow winners to claim using an anonymous trust (or company/LLC): Colorado Connecticut Florida Louisiana Massachusetts Ohio Pennsylvania .


Growing Number of States Move to Shield Lottery Winners | New Hampshire Public Radio


Skip to content. In-depth news coverage of the Greater Boston Area. New Hampshire. Local In-depth news coverage of the Greater Boston Area. Back to Article. Close Menu. Search for:. She later realized that if she had signed it with the name of a trust instead, she could have kept her identity secret. But lottery officials said she couldn’t change her mind. The winner went to court, saying in her complaint she had made “a huge mistake” and asking to keep her name out of the headlines.

The Lottery Commission argued in court last month this ensures transparency in the lottery system, and can’t be sidelined simply due to the size of the jackpot or reluctance of the winner. Doe can be released, citing her “strong privacy interest. William Shaheen, one of the lottery winner’s attorneys, said the woman was delighted with the decision.

The lottery winner collected her prize last week, without yet knowing whether she would be allowed to keep her name confidential, as NPR reported at the time :. Accessibility links Skip to main content Keyboard shortcuts for audio player.


New hampshire lottery anonymous


She’s likely to be the richest Jane Doe in New Hampshire history. The New Hampshire Lottery Commission said in a statement it is determining how to respond to the judge’s decision that went against its recommendation to name the winner. In his page resolution filed in Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District, Judge Charles Temple weighed the public’s right to know with the unnamed woman’s fears of “unreasonable intrusion” into her life and daily affairs.

Doe’s identity be revealed, she will be subject to an alarming amount of harassment, solicitation and unwanted communications,” the judge’s resolution states.

Doe, Temple noted, had “met her burden of showing that her privacy interest in the nondisclosure of her name outweighs the public interest in the disclosure of her name. The basis for this decision considered a series of reported cases documented in the resolution that showed lottery winners were subject or even targeted by strangers seeking handouts.

One man received a bomb threat at his home and another was forced to change his phone number after nonstop phone calls. Beyond safety concerns, Temple considered Doe’s hometown keeping hidden from the public eye. But the judge didn’t agree that naming the winner’s hometown put her in jeopardy of being outed. Temple wrote, “Given that any [female] person in Ms.

Doe’s hometown could potentially be the winner, it is highly unlikely that Ms. Doe could be identified as the winner solely based on the disclosure of that limited piece of information. And since Doe signed the ticket with her actual name before one of her attorneys she retained afterward told her she had forfeited her anonymity in doing so, the judge didn’t think the New Hampshire Lottery Commission made a good case that it would have denied her winnings if a trustee’s name was on the ticket instead of Doe’s.

Temple wrote the New Hampshire Lottery Commission “would have permitted the trustee of a trust to fill in the back of the ticket and claim the winning prize had Ms. Doe not already filled in the back of the ticket,” according to the resolution. To verify the lottery winner’s legitimacy, the judge wasn’t swayed by the commission’s claim that there is a strong public interest in disclosing winners’ identities so that the public knows “they are bona fide lottery participants” and “real winners.

In the resolution, Temple called that argument “weak” because a trustee claiming a prize on behalf of an anonymous individual is certainly not a “bona fide” participant and is not the “real” winner of the prize.

In terms of preventing accusations of corruption in this case, Temple’s resolution claims the front of the ticket is enough. The public, he wrote, would have “access to the front of the ticket displaying the winning numbers, the date of any claim, the amount of the prize and Ms.

Doe’s hometown. If the hometown and the numbers are out in the public sphere, Temple suggested that “further diminishes the public’s interest in learning the name written on the back of a winning ticket.

As for the ticket, Doe’s attorneys lobbied the judge to grant her a do-over. If so, Doe would be able to “white out” her signed name on the winning ticket’s reverse side and re-execute it with the “Good Karma Family Trust of ” — thus protecting the public from knowing her identity. We’ll notify you here with news about. Turn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest? Attorney Steven M. Gordon, who represents lottery winner “Jane Doe”, holds up an annual report from the New Hampshire Lottery during a hearing in the Jane Doe v.

Judge to decide if New Hampshire Powerball-winning woman can remain anonymous. NH Lottery Commission case, Feb. Why documents were allegedly in disarray during Trump’s final days in office. Oct 7, AM. Uvalde school district suspends police force, victims’ parents react. Oct 7, PM. Large fire reported on key bridge linking Russia to Crimea.

Texas officer fired after shooting hamburger-eating teenager. Suspect in deadly stabbings attacked to ‘let the anger out’: Arrest report. ABC News Live.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 + six =